Makinde Warns Oyo Monarchs Against Partisan Politics Ahead of 2027 Polls

Governor Seyi Makinde has delivered a pointed message to traditional rulers across Oyo State, urging them to steer clear of partisan politics as the country inches closer to the 2027 general elections. Speaking at a stakeholders’ meeting in Ibadan, the governor emphasized that monarchs serve as fathers to all citizens regardless of political affiliation, and their involvement in party politics undermines the neutrality essential to their office. The directive comes amid growing concerns about the increasing visibility of traditional rulers in political campaigns across Nigeria.

Governor’s Direct Appeal to Monarchs

During the interactive session with the Oyo State Council of Obas and Chiefs, Governor Makinde reminded the monarchs that their constitutional role places them above partisan fray. He noted that when traditional rulers openly endorse candidates or participate in campaign rallies, they risk alienating segments of their communities who may support opposing parties. The governor’s stance on traditional rulers politics reflects a broader push to insulate revered institutions from the polarizing effects of electoral competition.

“Your royal majesties, you are the fathers of everyone in your domains,” Makinde told the gathering. “Whether they belong to APC, PDP, Labour Party, or any other platform, they are all your children. When you take sides, you cease to be a father to all.” The governor’s remarks were met with nods of agreement from several senior monarchs present, though the practical implications for the coming election cycle remain to be seen.

Historical Context of Royal Political Engagement

The relationship between traditional institutions and partisan politics in Nigeria has always been complex. During the First Republic, many monarchs were openly aligned with political parties, particularly in the Western Region where the Action Group and later the Unity Party of Nigeria enjoyed strong royal backing. The military era saw a deliberate depoliticization of traditional councils, but the return to civilian rule in 1999 reopened the space for royal political engagement.

In recent election cycles, particularly 2015, 2019, and 2023, television footage frequently showed monarchs receiving presidential and gubernatorial candidates at their palaces, offering prayers, and sometimes making statements interpreted as endorsements. Critics argue this compromises the moral authority of traditional institutions, while defenders maintain that monarchs, as citizens, have constitutional rights to political expression. The tension between these perspectives has never been fully resolved.

Legal and Constitutional Framework

Nigeria’s 1999 Constitution (as amended) does not explicitly forbid traditional rulers from participating in politics. Section 40 guarantees every citizen the right to assemble freely and associate with other persons, including political parties. However, the same constitution recognizes traditional institutions in Section 7, empowering state governments to define their roles through legislation. Most states, including Oyo, have chieftaincy laws that emphasize the non-partisan nature of traditional office.

The Oyo State Chieftaincy Law charges monarchs with “the maintenance of law and order, the promotion of cultural heritage, and the welfare of their subjects” without reference to political activity. Legal scholars argue that while the constitution protects individual rights, the unique status of traditional rulers as symbols of unity creates an implied obligation of neutrality. Courts have occasionally weighed in, but no definitive Supreme Court ruling has settled the matter conclusively.

Reactions from the Council of Obas

The response from the Oyo State Council of Obas and Chiefs has been measured. The Alaafin of Oyo’s representative at the meeting acknowledged the governor’s position while noting that monarchs often face pressure from political actors seeking legitimacy. “We hear you, Your Excellency,” the representative stated. “But we also ask that politicians respect our palaces and not drag us into their contests.” This sentiment captures the dual challenge: monarchs staying out of politics requires politicians staying out of palaces.

Several younger monarchs privately expressed support for clearer guidelines. One oba, speaking on condition of anonymity, noted that “the ambiguity serves no one. If the law says we must be neutral, then enforce it. If it allows participation, define the limits. What we have now is a grey zone where everyone claims violation when it suits them.” This call for legislative clarity may gain traction in the Oyo State House of Assembly before the 2027 polls.

Implications for the 2027 Electoral Landscape

With the 2027 general elections approximately eighteen months away, the governor’s directive carries immediate political weight. Oyo State, a key battleground in Southwest Nigeria, saw fiercely contested gubernatorial and presidential races in 2023. The neutrality of influential monarchs in zones like Ibadan, Ogbomoso, Oyo, and Saki could shape voter perception and turnout. Political parties traditionally court royal blessings as signals of grassroots acceptance.

Analysts suggest Makinde’s move may be partly strategic. As a second-term governor ineligible to run again in 2027, his legacy and the prospects of his preferred successor could be affected by royal alignments. By establishing a neutrality norm now, he may be attempting to prevent any single monarch from becoming a de facto kingmaker in the succession race. The governor’s allies deny this calculation, framing the directive as principled rather than tactical.

Civil Society and Public Opinion

Civil society organizations in Oyo State have largely welcomed the governor’s stance. The Oyo State chapter of the Transition Monitoring Group issued a statement commending “the reinforcement of traditional institutions as neutral arbiters.” Youth groups, however, are divided. Some argue that monarchs should be free to express political preferences like any citizen, while others believe royal neutrality protects communal harmony in a state with diverse ethnic and religious compositions.

A recent informal poll conducted by a local radio station in Ibadan showed 68% of respondents supporting the governor’s position, 22% opposing it, and 10% undecided. While not scientifically rigorous, the poll reflects a public mood that leans toward keeping traditional institutions above partisan fray. Whether this sentiment holds through the heat of campaign season remains an open question.

Comparative Perspectives Across Nigeria

Oyo is not alone in grappling with this issue. In Kano, the emirate council has faced similar pressures, with the state government occasionally clashing with the emir over perceived political leanings. In Lagos, the Oba of Lagos’s 2015 comments about “throwing Igbos into the lagoon” if they voted a certain way sparked national outrage and renewed calls for royal political restraint. The Sultan of Sokoto and the Shehu of Borno have generally maintained studied neutrality, though their audiences with political leaders are closely scrutinized for hidden signals.

Ghana offers an instructive contrast. The National House of Chiefs there operates under a constitutional mandate that explicitly bars chiefs from active party politics. Violations can lead to destoolment. This clear framework has largely kept Ghanaian traditional rulers out of partisan contests, allowing them to mediate electoral disputes credibly. Nigerian reformers often cite the Ghanaian model as worth emulating.

The Path Forward: Legislation or Convention?

The debate now shifts to whether Oyo State should codify royal political neutrality into law or rely on moral suasion and convention. A bill amending the Chieftaincy Law to explicitly prohibit monarchs from endorsing candidates, attending political rallies, or allowing palaces to be used for campaign events would provide enforceable standards. However, such legislation could face constitutional challenges on freedom of association grounds.

Alternatively, a voluntary code of conduct, signed by all monarchs and witnessed by the governor, could establish norms without legal compulsion. This approach respects constitutional rights while creating peer pressure for compliance. The governor hinted at preferring the legislative route, stating that “what is not written cannot be enforced,” but acknowledged the need for broad consultation before any bill is drafted.

Economic and Developmental Considerations

Beyond elections, the governor linked royal neutrality to development outcomes. He argued that monarchs who remain above politics can more effectively advocate for their communities’ needs — roads, schools, healthcare — regardless of which party controls the state government. “When you are neutral, every government is your government,” Makinde said. “You can walk into any minister’s office in Abuja and be received as a father, not a political opponent.”

This pragmatic argument resonates with many traditional rulers who depend on state and federal allocations for community projects. Several monarchs at the meeting shared experiences of delayed projects following elections where they were perceived to have backed the losing side. The governor’s framing reframes neutrality not as a restriction but as a strategic advantage for community development.

Monitoring and Enforcement Mechanisms

Any framework for royal political neutrality requires monitoring. The Oyo State Ministry of Local Government and Chieftaincy Affairs would likely serve as the oversight body, but its capacity to monitor hundreds of monarchs across 33 local government areas is limited. Civil society groups have proposed a citizen-led monitoring platform where communities can report perceived violations, feeding into a transparent review process.

Technology could play a role. Social media monitoring tools already track political endorsements by public figures. Extending this to traditional rulers would be technically straightforward but raises privacy concerns. The governor’s office has not specified enforcement mechanisms, leaving a gap that will need filling before the 2027 campaign season intensifies.

Cultural Preservation Amid Political Change

Underlying the political debate is a deeper concern about cultural preservation. Traditional rulers are custodians of languages, festivals, rites, and histories that define Yoruba identity. When palaces become political arenas, cultural functions can be sidelined. The Oranyan Festival in Oyo, the Egungun Festival in Ibadan, and numerous other cultural events rely on royal leadership that commands universal respect.

Anthropologists warn that the politicization of traditional institutions erodes their spiritual and cultural authority over generations. Young people who see monarchs as political actors may disengage from cultural practices associated with those monarchs. In a region where cultural identity remains a powerful social glue, this long-term cost may outweigh any short-term political gain from royal endorsements.

FAQ

What exactly did Governor Makinde tell Oyo monarchs about politics?

Governor Seyi Makinde urged traditional rulers in Oyo State to stay away from partisan politics ahead of the 2027 elections, emphasizing that monarchs must remain neutral fathers to all their subjects regardless of political affiliation.

Is it illegal for traditional rulers to participate in politics in Nigeria?

The 1999 Constitution does not explicitly forbid traditional rulers from political participation, but state chieftaincy laws generally emphasize their non-partisan role. The legal position remains ambiguous, with no definitive Supreme Court ruling on the matter.

How might this directive affect the 2027 elections in Oyo State?

If observed, the directive could reduce the influence of royal endorsements on voter behavior in a key Southwest battleground state. Political parties would need to rely more on direct voter engagement rather than traditional ruler validation.

What happens if a monarch violates this neutrality directive?

Currently, there are no specified enforcement mechanisms. The governor has not outlined penalties, though the Oyo State Chieftaincy Law could potentially be amended to include sanctions for political partisanship by monarchs.

How do other Nigerian states handle traditional rulers and politics?

Approaches vary. Some states like Kano have experienced tensions between governments and emirates over perceived political leanings. Ghana’s model, where chiefs are constitutionally barred from active party politics, is often cited as a clearer framework.

Related Reading

• Oyo SDP Governorship Crisis Deepens as Candidate Heads to Court
• Oyo Governor Makinde Urges Traditional Rulers to Shun Partisan Politics
• Why the Bayeux Tapestry Is the Perfect Mirror for Franco-british Relations