Take It Back Movement Rejects Police Account of Sowore’s Ekiti Attack The Take It Back Movement has firmly rejected the Ekiti State Police Command’s account of the attack on its leader Omoyele Sowore, demanding the immediate removal of Commissioner CP Falade Adegoroye Michael and calling for prosecution of those involved. The controversial incident, which occurred in October 2026 in Ado-Ekiti, has sparked widespread debate about police transparency and political violence in Nigeria’s democratic process. The movement’s staunch rejection of the official narrative underscores growing concerns about accountability in the face of escalating tensions ahead of the 2027 general elections. Police Version of Events According to the Ekiti State Police Command, the attack on Sowore was the result of a misunderstanding between security personnel and protesters. The command claimed that Sowore was attacked by unknown assailants during a public gathering, and that police intervention was necessary to restore order. The official statement painted a picture of chaos rather than premeditated violence, suggesting that the incident was an isolated event with no political motive. However, the police account has been met with skepticism by many who believe that the attack was orchestrated to silence a vocal critic of the government. The police version has been criticized for its lack of detail and apparent attempt to downplay the severity of the incident. Critics argue that the narrative fails to address the broader context of political tensions in the run-up to the 2027 elections, where Sowore’s African Action Congress (AAC) is positioning itself as a key opposition force. The movement’s leader has long been a thorn in the side of the ruling party, and his recent presidential campaign has galvanized a significant portion of Nigeria’s youth vote. Take It Back Movement’s Response In a strongly worded statement, the Take It Back Movement dismissed the police account as “a deliberate attempt to mislead the public and shield those responsible for the attack.” The group accused the Ekiti State Police Command of covering up the true nature of the assault and called for an independent investigation. The movement’s spokesperson emphasized that Sowore’s safety and the integrity of Nigeria’s democratic process are non-negotiable priorities. The statement also demanded the immediate removal of CP Falade Adegoroye Michael, citing his failure to protect Sowore and his apparent bias in the face of growing political unrest. The movement warned that if the police do not cooperate with a transparent investigation, they would escalate their demands to include the prosecution of all those involved in the attack, regardless of their position in the security or political establishment. Implications for Democracy and Political Rights The attack on Sowore and the subsequent dispute over its circumstances highlight the fragile state of political rights in Nigeria. As the country prepares for the 2027 general elections, the Take It Back Movement’s defiance of the police narrative reflects a growing belief among Nigerians that the ruling establishment is unwilling to tolerate dissent. The movement’s stance resonates with a generation of voters who have grown increasingly disillusioned with the status quo and are seeking meaningful change through electoral participation. Sowore’s presidential candidacy has energized a movement that values transparency, accountability, and social justice. His arrest in 2023 during a protest against the government’s handling of economic hardship and corruption further solidified his image as a martyr for democratic reform. The recent attack, whether orchestrated or spontaneous, has only amplified calls for greater protection of political activists and opposition figures. International Reactions and Regional Context The incident has drawn attention from international observers, with human rights organizations expressing concern over the safety of political leaders in Nigeria. The African Union and various European diplomatic missions have called for a thorough and impartial investigation into the attack. The situation in Ekiti State mirrors similar challenges faced by opposition figures across the continent, where political violence and intimidation remain persistent threats to democratic governance. In neighboring countries such as Ghana, Kenya, and South Africa, civil society groups have closely followed the developments in Nigeria, drawing parallels between the challenges of political dissent and the need for robust democratic institutions. The Take It Back Movement’s demand for accountability aligns with broader regional efforts to strengthen democratic norms and protect the rights of political actors. Legal and Constitutional Considerations The attack on Sowore raises critical legal questions about the responsibilities of security forces in protecting political leaders. Under Nigeria’s constitution, the police are mandated to maintain public order and safeguard citizens’ rights, including the right to freedom of expression and assembly. The Take It Back Movement’s call for the prosecution of those responsible for the attack underscores the need for legal accountability and the enforcement of constitutional protections. Legal experts have noted that the police’s handling of the incident could be subject to review under Nigeria’s Freedom of Information Act and the administration’s own guidelines on the use of force. The movement’s demand for an independent investigation may also prompt calls for reforms within the police force to ensure transparency and impartiality in the face of political tensions. Frequently Asked Questions Who is Omoyele Sowore? Omoyele Sowore is a Nigerian activist and politician who founded the Take It Back Movement. He is the presidential candidate of the African Action Congress (AAC) for the 2027 general elections and has been a prominent critic of the Nigerian government’s policies. What is the Take It Back Movement’s stance on the police account? The Take It Back Movement has rejected the Ekiti State Police Command’s version of events surrounding Sowore’s attack, accusing the police of attempting to cover up the true nature of the incident. The group demands the removal of CP Falade Adegoroye Michael and calls for an independent investigation. What are the implications of the attack for the 2027 elections? The attack on Sowore has heightened tensions ahead of the 2027 elections, with the Take It Back Movement framing it as an attempt to silence opposition voices. The incident has galvanized support for Sowore’s campaign and underscored the need for greater protection of political activists in Nigeria’s democratic process. Has the federal government responded to the movement’s demands? As of October 2026, the federal government has not issued an official response to the Take It Back Movement’s demands. The incident remains under investigation, with calls for transparency and accountability growing louder among civil society groups and international observers. What actions is the Take It Back Movement taking? The movement has called for the immediate removal of the Ekiti State Commissioner of Police and has threatened to escalate its demands if the police do not cooperate with an independent investigation. The group is also mobilizing public support to pressure the government into addressing the broader issues of political violence and police accountability. Related Reading Isaac Fayose Calls for Unity with Peter Obi After Ekiti Attack Binance Pursues $6.3 bn Recovery After Massive Hack Linked to North Korea Russell Brand Court Case: Accusers Describe Years of Haunting Allegations Related posts: Sowore Blasts Adeleke Over Tinubu Visit Sowore Vows to Scrap Nigeria’s Office of First Lady If Elected in 2027 Sowore Minimum Wage Pledge: ₦500,000 Minimum Wage and Petrol Subsidy Revival Ahead of 2027 Election Basiru Labels Sowore a ‘skit Maker’ as Rejected Ballots Outshine AAC’s Vote Share Post navigation Obasanjo Warns Nigeria Debt Crisis Worse Than Leprosy in Tinubu Rebuke